Quel granello di sale
Question: reviews all have the same dignity? No.
So in saying this to be provocative, and someone may already esserglisi hair stand on end, but the important thing is understood.
So mind you.
As a little 'in all things, the extremes are always recognizable, and this also applies to opinions. So if someone were to say "cheers slavery" or "long live the war, his statements would be nothing short incommentabili and could never be shared today.
If someone, however, said "long live human rights" or "long live the dignity della persona”, meriterebbe sicuramente il plauso di tutti perché è questa la strada della civiltà e del rispetto reciproco.
Ma se gli opposti sono appunto facilmente riconoscibili, è nelle ipotesi che stanno tra di essi che si fa più fatica a muoversi perché la verità non si è ancora affermata come pacifica.
E ciò vale per le piccole questioni pratiche di tutti i giorni, come, e a maggior ragione, per le grandi questioni.
Vi faccio un esempio. Ultimamente sto studiando l’opportunità di istituire un contraddittorio anticipato, cioè un confronto tra le parti processuali anticipato rispetto all’adozione di taluni provvedimenti such as preventive detention. On this point there are many considerations to be made in particular, were one to adopt this solution, the procedure to be followed, and the practical problems, not at all easy to fix, which brings with it.
That said, we must also consider that a serious review and mainly those who qualified can get to a certain subject is an expert.
Tractent Fabril fabri , I said some time ago, "are blacksmiths to handling the tools of their trade."
Therefore more attention will have to listen to those who have experience and expertise in relation to a certain topic and its problematiche.
Se, per esempio, mi mettessi a parlare di una dibattuta questione di medicina, materia di cui so poco o niente, forse potrei direi qualcosa di intelligente (un po’ di buon senso dovrebbero averlo tutti); ma è molto più probabile che dalla mia bocca escano sciocchezze.
Così come un medico, che su quella questione potrebbe dire cose brillanti, interrogato su un argomento di diritto, magari quel contraddittorio anticipato di cui parlavo prima, potrebbe non cavarsela altrettanto bene.
Ma bisogna, poi, stare attenti (attentissimi!) ad un'altra cosa. Bisogna poter apprezzare l’onestà intellettuale della persona che parla e l’assenza interest than the search for truth in his reasoning.
This is true especially if the issue is very technical and is an expert talk about why, given the difficulty of the topics and the ability of the rapporteur, it is difficult to contradict him and against him a bit 'of trust must have it.
And trust is a precious thing and a rare commodity. It is difficult to earn a lot and need very little to lose.
understand, then, that the danger to soldiers and soldiers of personal interests and privileges in these cases is tremendous.
course, then, that all could be wrong. but I repeat that to err is human, continue or, worse yet, to know wrong from the beginning, is evil.
Having said all this, should we conclude that freedom of expression be limited? Absolutely not!
Vale, today and always, as Voltaire said: "I do not agree with you, but I would give my life for you to say."
The point is then you know meet the many opinions that come to our ears and carefully consider the trust.
The views, therefore, have between them the same value and should be considered grain of salt.
Alessandro Marchetti
0 comments:
Post a Comment